Schools Jewish group seeks to ensure continued religious instruction

Jews fight religion policy

Benjamin Preiss - Education Reporter

The Jewish instruction provider for state schools is seeking legal advice to ensure its lessons remain available amid concerns that new conditions will undermine cultural diversity.

The United Jewish Education Board has told parents it is exploring “all avenues, including legal options” so Jewish children can continue to receive special religious instruction.

The letter to parents comes after the Education Department issued a new ministerial directive in May that said schools could withdraw from religious instruction programs if there were insufficient resources. The directive also said religious instruction sessions must be “clearly opt-in” for parents.

“We are monitoring these developments very closely as we are concerned that some schools may not be in a position to deliver special religious instruction under the new framework,” the United Jewish Education Board letter said.

Principals must offer religious instruction to parents if their school is approached by accredited instructors who indicate they are available to run the sessions.

The board’s president, Yossi Goldfarb, said he was seeking legal advice about whether the new conditions would contravene the Multicultural Victoria Act.

Mr Goldfarb said cultural and religious diversity in schools would be threatened if principals began withdrawing religious instruction for Jewish children. “We see it as a cornerstone of multicultural Victoria,” he said.

Mr Goldfarb said the number of Jewish state school students joining religious instruction had in-creased by about 30 per cent during the past five years.

The United Jewish Education Board operates in 37 state schools, attracting about 1300 students. It offers instruction to schools with as few as three Jewish students.

Mr Goldfarb estimated more than 90 per cent of Jewish families in state schools receive religious instruction. He said the instructors had no interest in proselytising but sought to convey the “cultural, historical and national” aspects of Judaism.

Students who participate in religious instruction must now also be supervised by a teacher from the school. But Mr Goldfarb said many Jewish instructors were already qualified teachers so it made little sense to have them supervised by another teacher.

Bentleigh East mother Michelle Morgan said she supported Jewish instruction for her six-year-old daughter, Kayla, because it ensured there was a base level of education in Judaism for Jewish children. “They’re getting something out of it,” she said.

Religions for Peace Australia chairman Des Cahill said he was concerned that children from faiths with small numbers at schools could miss out on instruction in their religion because of the new directive. His organisation co-ordinates instruction in the Buddhist, Baha’i, Greek Orthodox, Hindu and Sikh traditions.

Professor Cahill, an RMIT ex-pert in intercultural studies, said education about the world’s religions should be included in the general school curriculum.

An Education Department spokesman said the rules for special religious instruction (SRI) were the same for all providers.

Fairness in Religions in School campaign member Scott Hedges said he had not received any complaints from Jewish families about the content of the Jewish Education Board’s sessions. However, he said a small number of Jewish families had expressed their opposition to religious instruction in state schools.

For more education stories visit


Fears as online firebrand joins ISIL cause

David Wroe [and] James Massola

A firebrand Australian Muslim preacher says he is joining the “caliphate” established by ultraviolent jihadists in the Middle East, a move that could prove a
powerful magnet to would-be extremist fighters.

Melbourne-born Musa Cerantonio, re­garded internationally as an influential cheer­leader for the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant, appeared on Twitter
early Wednes­day morning [2 July] to heap praise on the group and its announcement of a new Islamic state.

The former Catholic is believed to have been hiding out in the Philippines for months and is reportedly wanted by the Australian Federal Police.

Mr Cerantonio’s announcement came as Attorney-General George Brandis confirmed the government was looking at ways to make sure Australians returning from fighting with extremists in the Middle East would not pose a danger at home.

“The government is looking carefully at all existing legislation that bears upon this issue, in particular the terrorism provisions of the criminal code, to ensure there are no gaps in our capacity to keep Australia safe,” he said.

The case of Mr Cerantonio is particularly troubling because of his large online following and the risk that his presence in the Middle East would encourage
other Australians to travel to the region. On Twitter early on Wed­nesday morning, he gave enthusiastic support to the announcement by ISIL that it was
creat­ing a caliphate, or Muslim state, in the territ­ory it has seized straddling parts of Syria and Iraq. “Insha’Allah (God-willing) I will be arriv­ing in Ash-Sham (the Levant) very shortly, keep us in your du’a (prayers), getting ready to travel,” he wrote. “May Allah bless and protect our Imam, our Amir, our Khalifah, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.”

Al-Baghdadi is the leader of ISIL, an ultra-violent al-Qaeda splinter group believed to have executed thousands of civilians in Iraq, and has declared himself the caliph of the new territory. Mr Cerantonio was described in a recent report, by the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation at King’s College, London, as one of the three most influential preachers online.

One in four foreign fighters in the Middle East followed his Twitter account, while his Facebook page was the third most “liked” page among jihadists, the
study found.

Senator Brandis said he would introduce new laws to the Senate in two weeks that would reform security agencies’ powers and ensure there were no legal
loopholes in the fight against terrorism.


Strengthening the non-religious voice

Rosslyn Ives

Humanists need to act in ways that will strengthen the voice of non-religious people. Currently we belong to a growing cohort of “non-religious” Australians - over 4 million on the 2011 census - yet our public voice is weak and dispersed.

With our growing numbers, and the signs that Australia is becoming increasingly secular (with falling church attendances and growth in civil celebrant marriages and funerals), we need to back these trends with a stronger advocacy for our views. We want a society that values secular education, social justice and science as a source of information for policy decisions. And one that allows individuals the freedom to make decisions over life-and-death matters, such as voluntary assisted dying (a newly preferred term for voluntary euthanasia) and abortion.

If we want to be able to alter public policies we need much more effective ways of influencing governments and the wider society. We need able spokespersons and professional secretariats that can articulate the non-religious point of view.

Sadly, the history of the freethought groups across the world reveals two problems when such people try to organise themselves for effective action. First, most non-religious people prefer just to get on with their lives. Few have a strong urge to form social groups based on their world-view. Second, atheist, humanist, rationalist etc. groups can readily become dominated by strong-minded individuals. This can lead to some members becoming less willing to stay involved, along with others hiving off to form alternate groups. For these and other reasons non-religious organisations have small memberships and little public profile.

An obvious way round these problems is to work cooperatively in loose alliances with other non-religious groups (and even religious groups on issues of shared concern). In recent years HSV and the Rationalist Society of Australia have jointly sponsored several successful events involving interstate and overseas speakers. HSV also collaborates with like-minded groups on issues that matter to Humanists.

After the first Global Atheist Congress was held in Melbourne in 2010, an attempt was made to form an Australia-wide alliance of non-religious groups, under the name Reason Australia. After a lot of ground work via e-mail, skype and telephone hook-ups, this attempt floundered. The participants are likely to offer a range of reasons for the failure of this idealistic undertaking.

More recently HSV has associated itself with a loose alliance called the Secular Coalition of Australia (SECOA). The June VH included a strong statement from SECOA opposing the federal government’s National School Chaplaincy Program.

While the arguments for the different freethought groups to work together to strengthen the non-religious voice are overwhelming, how we go about this requires considerable good will and time. We need urgently to engage with others NOW! Progress is likely to be two steps forward and one step back, but the greater goal of increasing our influence in a growing secular Australia will make the effort worthwhile.

From the Victorian Humanist (Melbourne), 53 (6), July 2014: 6.


Alleged sex abuse victim sues school

Patrick Hatch

A former student at an ultra-orthodox Jewish school in Melbourne is suing the school and its former principal, who fled the country days after molestation claims surfaced against her.

Malka Leifer fled to Israel in 2008, days after being sacked as principal of Adass Israel Girls School in Elsternwick following complaints of inappropriate conduct with students.

Parents told The Age at the time that Mrs Leifer molested students aged 15 and 16 at her home and probably at school camps, and that one victim tried to commit suicide.

Two former students filed civil claims in the Melbourne Supreme Court in March last year against Mrs Leifer and the school for breach of duty.

Solicitor Nick Mazzeo, of law firm Lennon Mazzeo, has acted on behalf of several former students at the school who claim to have been sexually abused by Mrs Leifer.

He confirmed that one of his clients, whose case is listed for trial in May 2015, is seeking damages for pain, suffering and economic loss. It is understood a second case has been withdrawn, “There’s a whole host of damages they allege have been sustained, including psychological injury,” he said.

Mrs Leifer lives in Immanuel, a settlement town in the West Bank, where her husband is a rabbi at a local synagogue.

A town resident, who did not wish to be named, said Mrs Leifer often took children from the synagogue to her house for tutoring and to study the Torah, sparking alarm among residents who know of the accusations against her.

Victoria Police launched an investigation into claims of abuse at the school in 2011, and a police spokesman confirmed on Friday that the Moorabbin sexual offences and child abuse investigation team was still investigating the case.

“It is believed the person of interest . . . is currently overseas,” Sergeant Kris Hamilton said, adding that investigators had therefore not yet spoken to her.

Adass Israel School principal Israel Herszberg said the school would not comment on any matter that was before the courts.

Parents of students at the school alleged to The Age in 2008 that Mrs Leifer, a mother of eight, shared her bed with different students when her husband was away.

One parent said problems emerged when their 16-year-old daughter stopped eating and became unsociable. The girl told a psychologist she had been molested but was too embarrassed to tell her parents.

The Adass community is a small, ultra-orthodox group of families based in Elsternwick and Ripponlea who have little contact with the wider Jewish and non-Jewish communities.


Rabbi tapes reveal sex abuse cover-up

Richard Baker [and] Nick McKenzie

Some of Australia’s most senior orthodox Jewish leaders are under investigation for allegedly failing to report multiple instances of child sexual abuse,

The Sunday Age has obtained witness statements and tape recordings from this month’s successful prosecution of a former Bondi [Sydney] Yeshiva authority figure, Daniel Hayman, that indicate senior Jewish leaders failed to act on complaints of abuse and cast doubt over their public statements on
the scandal.

The documents and recordings provide an insight into strongly held views within segments of Australia’s ultra-orthodox Jewish communities that child sexual abuse should not be reported to secular authorities.

New South Wales police and the NSW Ombudsman are examining whether senior rabbis broke the law by failing to report incidents of alleged child sexual abuse at Bondi’s Yeshiva centre to authorities.

Similar investigations are taking place in Melbourne into the failure by leaders of St Kilda’s Yeshiva college to act on allegations of abuse by two former employees who were recently jailed for sexual abuse offences against students.

Under the NSW Ombudsman Act 1974, it is an offence for the leaders of a government and non-government agency to fail to report allegations of child
sexual abuse to the Ombudsman. The head of an agency must also ensure employees report alleged abuse. Institutions such as Catholic schools and
the Yeshiva Centre are bound by that legislation.

A NSW police spokesman confirmed that detectives from Strike Force Bungo had been liaising with the NSW Ombudsman’s investigators “regarding whether there may have been a failure to report incidents of abuse to the Ombudsman”.

The spokesman said detectives had not identified sufficient evidence to take the matter to court but were continuing their inquiries.

Documents and tape recordings obtained by Fairfax Media reveal three senior Sydney rabbinical figures were allegedly told of Hayman’s offending by victims during the 1980s. But none contacted police.

Instead, Hayman was sent to the United States only to return to indecently assault a 14-year-old boy and allegedly molest a 12-year-old girl.

Hayman, 50, this month received a 19-month suspended jail sentence after pleading guilty to aggravated indecent assault of a 14-year-old boy at a youth camp in the late 1980s. Hayman was 24 at the time and working at the Yeshiva-run camp.

Magistrate David Williams said he had to sentence Hayman by applying laws relevant to the time of his offending, adding that Hayman would have been jailed if he had been tried under contemporary laws.

Mr Williams also had to acquit Hayman of an indecent assault offence against a 12-year-old girl because of a legal “oddity”.

Mr Williams said he was bound to apply an old law in place at the time of the incident. Under this law, if there was any possibility Hayman’s offence was more serious than the crime of indecent assault he was charged with, he had to be acquitted.

Witness statements and court testimony reveal several children allegedly approached former senior Yeshiva figure, Rabbi Boruch Lesches, between 1986 and 1989 to report Hayman’s indecent conduct.

One of Hayman’s alleged victims testified last month how he and a group of boys went to the home of Rabbi Lesches in 1986 or 1987 to report Hayman’s
abuse of them.

Another alleged victim told the court how she told Rabbi Lesches, now a senior Chabad leader in New York, in 1989 that Hayman had committed an indecent act on her.

The court testimony contradicts a public statement released by Rabbi Lesches last year in which he said: “I had no knowledge of the alleged charges claimed to have occurred some 25 years ago.”

Rabbi Lesches released the statement after Fairfax Media broadcast a legally recorded telephone conversation in which he admitted knowing of concerns about Hayman’s behaviour and of one case of alleged abuse. But Rabbi Lesches publicly asserted that the complainant against Hayman was about the same age, about 21. The alleged victim dis-cussed in the recorded conversation was almost a decade younger.

Rabbi Lesches also added in the phone conversation his belief that some sexual abuse victims may have “consented” and cautioned against reporting
Hayman to police. He later apologised for these remarks.

A witness statement to police also implicates one of Australia’s most senior Jewish leaders in covering up for Hayman. In a 2011 witness statement, a former Bondi Yeshiva rabbinical college student alleges he told the senior Jewish leader, whom Fairfax Media has chosen not to identify, of Hayman’s alleged offending against two teenage boys. The statement says that after the senior rabbi was told of the incidents, Hayman was sent overseas. The alleged victims were given no counselling and police were not called.

A November 2011 tape recording of a conversation between Hayman and a victim contains admissions of inappropriate conduct.

Hayman told the victim that Rabbi Lesches and the present spiritual head of the Bondi Yeshiva centre, Rabbi Pinchas Feldman, had both spoken to him about his conduct during the mid-to-late 1980s.

“He [Rabbi Feldman] just told me it shouldn’t happen and I should take steps to avoid it,” Hayman said in the recorded conversation. “It was a once-off conversation in his office.”

When reports first emerged last year that police were investigating alleged abuse at the Bondi Yeshiva centre, Rabbi Feldman said: “I do not recall anyone ever coming to me with such a problem. I am shocked to hear that anything of this nature has taken place here.”

Following Fairfax Media’s report of the conversation, Rabbi Feldman’s lawyer threatened to sue.

The Bondi Yeshiva centre later released a statement saying Rabbi Feldman had no recollection of any-one confessing to him their involvement in child sexual abuse.

Fairfax Media has learnt that people who have given evidence against Hayman have been intimidated and vilified within their communities.

A male victim of Hayman’s, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, told Sydney’s Downing Centre Local Court last month that he was “abandoned” and “cast out” by his adoptive family. “The community was more intent on protecting its good name than me,” he said.

Fairfax Media emailed Rabbi Lesches’s son, who last year handled his media comments, for a response but he has not responded.

Know more?


Family shock as teens head to Iraq

Natalie O’Brien, Jonathan Swan [and] Fergus Hunter

Two teenage boys from south-west Sydney have travelled to the Middle East without their parents’ knowledge and are believed to be heading to Iraq to join the fighting.

One of the boys, Abdullah Elmir, who turned 17 earlier this month, told his mother he was “going fishing” before he disappeared from his home in the Bankstown area just over a week ago.

His family said they discovered he had left the country only after Abdullah sent a text message to another family member asking them to tell his mother he had “gone” and did not know his current location. They have since learnt he left with a 16-year-old boy, who they have never met nor heard of, by the name of Feiz.

Abdullah’s family said they are shocked and devastated and want their son brought back home. They believe he has been “brainwashed” and want to know who paid for his air ticket and encouraged him to go.

ASIO and the federal police have since been questioning friends of the family about Abdullah, and who might have given him the money to buy the air ticket and whether he was going to the Middle East to join jihadists.

The Australian government believes there are up to 150 Australians who have joined extremist groups in the Middle East including the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL); and The Sunday Age can reveal they are overwhelmingly coming from New South Wales and Victoria.

According to a senior government source, at least half the people come from NSW, while a “substantial” number come from Victoria, and these states dwarf numbers coming from other states and territories.

Most of the Australians are understood to be fighting with Sunni extremists in the Syrian civil war, while about 10 are known to have travelled to Iraq, joining ISIL, which is surging towards Baghdad with plans to overthrow the Iraqi government.

Foreign Minister Julie Bishop describes the phenomenon as the most serious threat to Australia’s domestic security in “some time”. In Parliament last week she said it was “simply chilling” to hear an Australian accented jihadist on a video urging others to join the fighting.

“To put the current situation in perspective: approximately 30 Australians are believed to have engaged with al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan prior to the NATO-led intervention,” she said.

Abdullah’s family and friends said he was a normal teenager who had just finished school and liked X-Box, playing with the family cat and hanging out with his brothers and sisters.

He was very bright and had just finished school.

It is understood the two boys travelled from Sydney to Perth, Malaysia, Thailand and, finally, Turkey. Abdullah contacted his family from Turkey telling them he was going to “cross the border” and they understood he meant he was heading to Iraq.

His mother tried to convince him not to go and was preparing to travel to Turkey to try to bring him back. She contacted the Department of Foreign Affairs immediately to advise them of her plan. But by that time Abdullah is understood to have left Turkey.

“We are devastated that we may never be able to see him again. We wish for his safety and we want the government to help bring him home,” a family member said.

The family’s lawyer, Zali Burrows, said they are concerned that government agencies had known about the boys’ plans but had not stopped the youths from leaving Australia.

“What is concerning is that if the federal police and ASIO had the intelligence, then why did they fail to stop him from departing or fail to stop the boy while he was in Turkey?” Ms Burrows said.

“The family believes that the government knows where their boy is and they just want them to bring him home.”


Lobby group funds mosque fight

Chris Johnston

A far-right, anti-Islam lobby group in Queensland has given up to $10,000 to opponents of the Bendigo mosque to help their campaign.

Restore Australia gave the money to print anti-mosque material. It is a not-for-profit group run by former One Nation candidate Mike Holt, a Vietnam veteran and author, and Charles Mollison, a former lieutenant-colonel who also served in Vietnam. Both men live on the Sunshine Coast.

Mr Holt confirmed the amount, which had been donated to Restore Australia, was given to a group called Stop the Mosque in Bendigo and also to a Victorian chapter of the Patriot Defence League Australia.

Stop the Mosque in Bendigo runs an active anti-Islam Facebook page from Bendigo and Beaufort, near Ballarat. The administrators, Julie Kendall and Monika Evers, did not return calls.

Patriot Defence League Australia, with a fierce anti-Islam agenda, has chapters in most states. Victorian members attended Bendigo council meetings about the mosque wearing T-shirts bearing the group’s insignia.

Mr Holt said Stop the Mosque in Bendigo and the PDLA were “our foot soldiers on the ground”.

“We are not right-wing crazies,” he said. “We are ordinary Australians opposed to the Islamisation of our country.”

The PDLA emerged this week as the group most likely to have tied black balloons on Bendigo buildings and homes, including that of pro-mosque City of Greater Bendigo councillor Mark Weragoda.

A Ballarat spokesman for the group did not deny involvement, but when pressed said: “No comment.”

Restore Australia also administers a sub-group called Islam4Infidels, which is-sues written advice for people or communities wanting to campaign
against mosques.

Mr Holt said Restore Australia shared material and ideology with two groups in Britain: the English Defence League, known for anti-Islamic street protests, and Liberty Great Britain, a new far-right political party.

He said the Bendigo mosque issue had brought previously separate Australian anti-Islam groups together. “We were not united before. But this issue has managed to unite us.”

A planning application for the mosque was passed by a majority of Bendigo councillors last week, but Re-store Australia has paid for a Sydney lawyer often used in anti-mosque hearings, Robert Balzola, to appeal to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal on planning grounds.

Local objectors say the mosque would breach regulations concerning parking, noise and traffic.

If built, the Australian Islamic Mission $3 million mosque will feature two floors, a café and sports hall on vacant land in the east of the city.


There’s no bigotry in challenging extremism

Muslims should be no more immune to criticism than any other religious group.


“Have not the Islamophobes already won the day when a person dare not speak on controversial matter she cause he is Muslim?” asked Simon Longstaff on Twitter last week.

That was a very strange rhetorical question in the circumstances. He was commenting on the fact that Uthman Badar, spokesman for the radical Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir, had had his invitation withdrawn to speak at the Sydney Opera House on the proposition that “honour killings are morally justified”.

Is Longstaff serious? Does he really believe this is a debate worth having? Does he really believe that horror at so-called “honour killings” is Islamophobic?

Suppose it was suggested that there be a public debate on the proposition that “wife-beating by white males is perfectly OK”.

Would Longstaff agree this was a topic that called for debate? Would he denounce those who rejected any such debate as exhibiting “aggressive or drunken white male-ophobia”?

Let’s get a little real. If there is a controversial topic worthy of debate regarding Islam and women, it is surely the question: “Can open debates, in which Islamic traditions are criticised, be conducted with-out Islamists threatening violence to all concerned?”

Such criticism is not Islamophobia, any more than criticism of child sexual abuse within the Christian churches is “Christianophobia”. And Badar is hardly in a position where he “dare not speak on controversial matters”. He freely does so all the time without the slightest hindrance.

It’s high time we got this Islamophobia thing sorted out. Islam is a religion with a long history, riddled with contradictions and conflicts. In recent decades some of its more wild-eyed proponents have been on the warpath, determined to establish whole new caliphates. But even among those who are not jihadists in this sense, there are practices that are, to say the least, controversial.

Neither of those two statements is itself controversial and neither is Islamophobic. But there is a fundamental point at issue that goes beyond them. Islam, merely because it is a religion, can no more claim immunity from criticism or rejection than any other religion, be it Catholicism, Orthodox Judaism, Mormonism or Jainism. It is, however, in our time, more violently resistant than most to both criticism and rejection.

If I state that I am not a Muslim, and that there is no possibility of my ever becoming one, that is not Islamophobia. It has exactly the same status as declaring it is unthinkable to me that I could ever become a Biblical literalist or a flat-earther. If I am a Muslim already, however, and come out with the statement that I am renouncing Islam, I can find myself in deep doo-doo.

In between, there is the terrain on which non-Muslims or liberal Muslims criticise old practices and bigotry or violent jihad. These criticisms are too glibly dismissed as Islamophobia by the “politically correct” and can lead to threats of violence by Islamists.

Some years ago I was asked by academics at the University of Melbourne to help draw up a list of speakers for a conference on Islam, Christianity and tolerance. I urged that Ibn Warraq be invited. He is a former Muslim who, like Ayaan Hirsi Ali, has written courageously of the extraordinary threats that confront apostates from Islam. His books Why I am not a Muslim (1995),What the Koran Really Says (2002) and the edited volume of testimonies Leaving Islam (2003) are landmark studies in the debate over the nature and future of Islam in a multicultural world.

What was the response? A staff member, who happened to be from an Islamic background, exclaimed heatedly: “Inviting him would be a disaster! That man is a fanatic!”

I was stunned at the time and still remain incredulous, I would have thought that such a voice was indispensable to building a society in which people can freely choose whether or not Islam holds any appeal for them? under a secular law that constrains Islamic fervour in the same way and for the same reasons it has constrained Christian fervour.

So here is a topic for Simon Longstaff, the St James Ethics Centre and the Sydney Opera House to hold a public debate on, by all means inviting Uthman Badar to contribute: Those who speak out about abuses under Islam are every bit as deserving of our recognition and protection as religious dissenters in the old Catholic era or human rights dissidents under Communist régimes.

Let Mr Badar speak, by all means, on behalf of Hizb ut-Tahrir. We would be all ears, I’m sure.

No sensible person wants to inflame phobias; but no self-respecting citizen of a free society should bow to intimidation by self-styled “militants” or affect a craven piety in the face of unrepentant sectarian bigotry of the Hizb ut-Tahrir variety.

Paul Monk is an author, former senior intelligence analyst and commentator on public and international affairs


Mosque Former One Nation figure behind protest Anti-Islamic groups funding Bendigo fight

Aisha Dow [and] Rania Spooner

Bendigo has become a rallying point for a loosely affiliated network of right-wing and anti-Islamic groups providing cash and support for the fight
to block the city’s first mosque.

The Bendigo campaign, which included the spread of black balloons, is just the latest in a string of challenges to the development of Islamic schools and prayer centres across Australia that have been linked to a handful of political groups and individuals.

Former Queensland One Nation candidate Mike Holt, the chief executive of non-profit organisations Restore Australia and Islam4Infidels, says his groups raised the money to hire a Sydney-based lawyer to fight the mosque proposal.

“They use the mosques as a centre for jihad. These things are not like the tea and coffee churches,” Mr Holt said.

This week Restore Australia’s founder Charles Mollison will travel to Bendigo to meet locals.

Another lobby group, the anti-Islamic Q Society, held a meeting in Bendigo on 11 May to talk to locals about how the mosque would affect their community and how to fight it.

Mr Holt, who is based on the Sunshine Coast, is also acting as a spokesman for the “Concerned Citizens of Bendigo”. The group claims to be local, but its members have refused to identify themselves.

“We don’t give interviews because of security,” an anonymous administrator of the “Stop the Mosque in Bendigo” group told Fairfax Media.

The Concerned Citizens of Bendigo website has a private URL, but has been created by the same web design firm that created the Restore Australia website.

Mr Holt last year took responsibility for the distribution of “Beware! Halal foods funds terrorism” stickers in Queensland, which were branded “offensive, grotesque and designed to inflame hatred” by the state’s Multicultural Affairs Minister.

The former IT business owner hired Sydney lawyer and prominent Christian Robert Balzola to challenge the Bendigo mosque’s planning permit application.

“We’re providing a lot of financial help and other help there [in Bendigo],” Mr Holt said, although he would not say exactly how much cash had been raised. “It’s a good amount of money,” he said.

In 2012 Mr Balzola represented a group called the Concerned Citizens of Canberra in their fight to block the development of a mosque in Gungahlin.

He also previously acted for a residents’ group that moved to block an Islamic school in south-west Sydney.

Mr Balzola would not confirm whether he had been formally engaged to represent the Concerned Citizens of Bendigo.

On the weekend he spoke at a Catch the Fire Ministries event in Sydney, which was also attended by the Defence Force Conservative Action Network’s
Bernard Gaynor, an outspoken campaigner whose organisation also filed an objection to the Bendigo mosque.

The objection, which was posted on the DEFCAN website, argues the Bendigo mosque would be contrary to ensuring peace and good order in the city.

There were 254 objections submitted to the council and of those 171 cited the influence of Islam and its association with violence and terrorism as their grounds for objection, according to council minutes.

Although the local community appears to be receiving substantial outside support, the majority of the objections lodged, 203, were from people who reported that they lived in the Greater Bendigo region.

Spokesman for the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils, Keysar Trad, said it was disappointing outside groups had been trying to import “hate” into the Bendigo community.

He said the Muslim community had been monitoring the Bendigo development with “some amusement”, but also concern the divisive debate would “take Australia backwards”.

“It really breaks our heart. You sit there thinking the people who [hold these anti-Islamic views] could be a potential teacher . . . if these people have these terrible negative views they are likely to discriminate against our children.”


Labor MP, Greens senator in joint bid to get euthanasia bill through

Dan Harrison

Labor MP Alannah MacTiernan and Greens Senator Richard Di Natale will co-sponsor legislation to legalise euthanasia across Australia.

Ms MacTiernan, a former state MP in Western Australia, said the matter could not be left to state and territory governments. “This is something that should be a standard for all Australians,” she told Fairfax Media.

Speaking in Parliament earlier on Monday [23 June], Ms MacTiernan said politicians had been “far too timid” on the delicate issue, despite polls showing strong public support for change to allow people to be legally assisted to die. She called on supporters of change to make their views known to politicians so Parliament could resolve the issue “once and for all”.

Senator Di Natale, a medical doctor, has drafted a bill that would allow a terminally ill person to access drugs to end their life. Under the proposal, the person’s condition would have to be verified by two medical practitioners, and the person would have to undergo a mental health assessment to ensure they were of sound mind.


Syndicate content