Full disclosure finally

In sharing her story before a royal commission, sex abuse survivor Beth Heinrich hopes to find freedom from the past. Amanda Gearing reports.

For the better part of two decades, Anglican church leaders "passed by on the other side of the road" when child sexual abuse survivor Beth Heinrich appealed to them for justice.

But one bishop from their flock will stand by her side today. His presence, Heinrich says, will give her the strength to tell her whole story, for the first time, to a private session of the Royal Commission into Institu­tional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse in Melbourne.

Geelong-based Bishop Peter Danaher expects there will be opposition to his supportive stance from within the church, but he knows it is the right thing to do.

"There will be people who will be absolutely horrified that I have done this," he said. "I believe in my own conscience that I need to be there with Beth."

Rather than emotional scars, Hein­rich still has open wounds from the abuse in the 1950s that, she says, des­troyed her career prospects and left her alienated from her children.

Indeed Heinrich, who now lives in rural Victoria, says she wears a mouth guard almost continuously, to prevent the tension in her jaw from destroying her teeth. She attributes this tension to anger over the abuse, plus the dam­age done by church authorities when she disclosed the abuse in 1995.

Heinrich's victimisation by a priest and later bishop, Donald Shearman, first came to public attention in 2002, when then governor-general Peter Hollingworth told the ABC's Australi­an Story that the relationship - between a young priest and a teenage girl - was "not sex abuse".

"There was no suggestion of rape or anything like that, quite the contrary," he said. "My information is that it was rather the other way round."

Hollingworth resigned from his vice-regal office in 2003, after the find­ings of an independent Anglican in­quiry into the Brisbane diocese were released.

Also after the inquiry, the diocese charged Shearman under canon law with maintaining a sexual relationship with a child when he was warden of a student hostel and assistant priest in the New South Wales town of Forbes. In 2004 he was found guilty and deposed from holy orders.

Although Heinrich was the key wit­ness in the case to remove Shearman from the priesthood, the unresolved process left her feeling incomplete. Slabs of her statement were redacted by church lawyers. She received no apology from the offender; and no compensation for the offences.

"They used me and chucked me out," she says.

It is chiefly for this reason that she is so grateful for the opportunity to speak at today's hearing. She wants to tell her story without censorship.

A 300-page dossier of 70 documents prepared by Monash University's Ad­junct Professor Chris Goddard will set out the ebb and flow of her battle for justice, which has had minor victories along the way. Although the Brisbane diocese did not pay Heinrich compens­ation, in 2005 the Bathurst diocese (which includes the parish of Forbes where the child sexual offences oc­curred) paid her $100,000.

Heinrich says the amount was inad­equate considering the offences began when she was a child in Shearman's care and that she suffered two further episodes of abuse as an adult when Shearman was in a pastoral position and committed sexual misconduct in the 1970s and 1980s.

But Heinrich says that it was the church's removal of slabs of her evid­ence (ostensibly to protect Shear­man's wife from further hurt) that has most revented her from full recovery. It was, she says, his cruel comments about his wife that initially made the teenage Heinrich feel sympathy for Shearman and his need for a young companion.

Her own childhood on her parents' wheat and sheep property in central New South Wales had been secure and happy. At 14 her parents had to send her to Forbes to attend secondary school. There she lived at St John's hostel, where the Reverend Donald Shearman and his wife Fay were the warden and matron in charge of 40 teenage boys and girls.

Shearman's fondness for Beth was obvious. He danced with her at socials and gave her gifts of chocolate, money and alcohol - a prayer book, a pearl necklace and a gold cross.

In her second and third years at the hostel, he had sex with her, she says, in the Shearmans' private quarters on his fox skin rug on the floor and in their marital bed. To convince her she was old enough to have sex, he told her their relationship was like Romeo and Juliet.

The sexual relationship continued for more than 18 months until one day when Shearman summarily expelled Beth from the hostel, summoning her father
to take her home in disgrace, allegedly for being promiscuous with boys - a claim Beth emphatically denies.

Once home on her parents' prop­erty, she received a letter from Shear­man asking her to be patient and keep busy, as it would take some time for him to "work things out" so they could be married and work together for God.

When that did not happen, a broken­-hearted Beth married a local farmer and had five children. She says her husband was a threatening alcoholic. Two decades passed, and Heinrich sunk into depression, believing God was punishing her. Eventually she asked Shearman to help her and her children to escape from the marriage. By then a bishop, Shearman rekindled a sexual relationship with her.

"My darling Beth," his many hand­written love letters begin. They speak of his yearning for her, retell the pedes­trian details of his life and diocesan duties, and share his plans for them to serve God together as a married couple.

Leading a double life, the bishop paid for a unit for Heinrich in Ballina, at the northern extent of his diocese of Grafton, giving him an excuse to travel often to the farthest-flung parish. He sent her the fox skin rug. At the same time he was recognised by the Queen, who invited him to London to be induc­ted as an OBE at Buckingham Palace.

While in England, the surreptitious sexual relationship came unstuck. Fay Shearman collected the mail one day, read a letter from Heinrich, and wrote a message to her husband on the front of the envelope: "Opened this by mis­take, darling - am very disturbed by it - feel quite sick. I love you too. Fay."

That night Shearman wrote to Hein­rich: "I feel so guilty, as of course I am. I doubt that she [Fay] will be able to keep this to herself and this thing I dreaded most of all is now about a certainty. That is that I should bring scandal on the church and allow the devil to take advantage of my selfish­ness and my wrong doing."

The next day he wrote again, ac­knowledging the hypocrisy of his beha­viour: "I have erred - sinned - against God - against you - against Fay and my family and against the church of which I am an apostle and therefore a pro­tector of its faith and order and moral­ity. I have failed you all and for that I am truly, truly sorry."

Still, Shearman continued writing to Heinrich, and rekindled the adulter­ous relationship again in the early 1980s, before leaving his wife and mov­ing to Wagga Wagga to live with her.

When Grafton diocese staff tracked him down, the dean (now Bishop) Ric­hard Hurford chartered a plane to Wagga Wagga, collected the bishop and flew with him back to Grafton.

In the 1990s, Heinrich asked Shear­man for help when her son was dying of leukaemia. He started writing again, and sent her things for the home he planned for them to share. After almost 40 years of believing his pledge to marry her, Heinrich's faith in his promises finally gave out. She confron­ted him by phone in 1994, when he finally told her, "I'm too old for you now".

Heinrich reasoned, at last, that he had always been too old for her. He had used his spiritual power and authority as a priest and hostel warden to betray her innocence - and to hold her captive for most of her life. She put pen to paper in 1995, writing to his superior in the Brisbane diocese, the then archbishop of Brisbane, Peter Hollingworth, setting out Shearman's offences against her as a child and his abuse of her over subsequent decades.

She wanted Shearman to admit he had lied to her parents in 1956, when he accused her of promiscuity - falsely blackening her name and destroying her aspirations of attending university and becoming a teacher.

Shearman refused to sign the apology Heinrich drafted. Archbishop Hollingworth then wrote to her saying the two accounts of the abuse had "a very wide discrepancy", and that Shearman's ministry was "much valued. Hollingworth warned her not to sue the "struggling" dioceses of Bathurst and Grafton, and refused to remove Shearman from officiating at church services.

"He called me a liar," Heinrich says simply.

Bishop Danaher says church hier­archies that have placed clergy above other people - "on such a high pedes­tal" - have made it difficult for victims to name clerical offenders. Of Hollingworth's letter, his appraisal is scathing.

"The reply he gave was quite wrong. That was his downfall," Danaher said. "I think the way he dealt with it was abominable."

The letter was indeed a blow to Heinrich. She recoiled from the church. She finally reported the early sexual abuse to NSW police in 1996, but Shearman could not be prosecuted due to the statute of limitations on sexual crimes in the 1950s.

"I believe God thinks with absolute pain about what has been happening in the church. God weeps. God's heart is broken." - Bishop Peter Danaher

It was not until 2001 that Heinrich wrote again, this time to several arch­bishops and a dozen bishops around the country. She felt unheard, but in 2002 a media storm erupted over widespread child sexual abuse in the Anglican Church. Heinrich broke her silence in public, revealing that Hollingworth, by then governor-general, had heard a bishop admit to sex offences with a child and had al­lowed him to continue preaching.

The case was one of several ex­amined by an independent Anglican Board of Inquiry into the Brisbane dio­cese. Shearman was defrocked.

But still Heinrich could not find peace, not without the hearing to which she was entitled under the Bris­bane diocese's sexual abuse complaint protocol, a hearing she was repeatedly denied by the church.

Heinrich hopes publicity about her appearance at the royal commis­sion will inspire others who have been treated similarly to come for­ward and tell their story now.

"I'm sure I'm not the only one who has been mistreated," she says. "There are other people who have run away. Not everyone is as strong as I am."

Fairfax Media sought comment from Donald Shearman, who lives at a north Brisbane beachside retirement resort in Deception Bay. He declined to be interviewed. However, speaking through an intermediary, Shearman, now 88, has agreed to Heinrich's re­quest for a face-to-face apology. No date or location has yet been arranged.

As he steps into the royal commis­sion today, Danaher is mindful of the damage done to the church by its treatment of abuse victims.

"I believe God thinks with absolute pain about what has been happening in the church. God weeps," he said. "God's heart is broken."

Yet in a sign of positive institutional change, Danaher has won the endorse­ment of Australia's Anglican Primate, Melbourne Archbishop Philip Freier, who told Fairfax Media he was "very pleased that an Anglican bishop could offer help and comfort to a victim of another Anglican bishop".

After 19 years of struggling for justice, Heinrich is simply happy that the royal commission will hear her story.

"It's marvellous," she says. "I want the royal commission to know what Shearman said and did. I want them to know what the church did. I will have the satisfaction that my evidence will not be censored. And that they will believe me.

"I won't personally gain anything by doing this, but I feel a duty to help the royal commission to understand the insidious nature of abuse."

From: http://www.smh.com.au/national/church-sex-abuse-survivor-beth-heinrich-a...

We are being terrorised, say Muslims

Michael Koziol [and] Leila Abdallah

[In Australia] A car has been damaged and daubed with offensive comments, threatening letters have been sent, and women have been abused in the street.

A backlash of hate crimes against the Muslim community in the wake of the police raids last week has also sparked a rash of social media comments such as “This is how they should deal with them”, “Behead them all”, “Give them a taste of their own medicine for a change”, and “We just need to blow up Parramatta n Bankstown”.

“It is not OK to go Muslim-bashing.” ? Joseph Wakim

One of the founders of the Australian Arabic Council and human rights activist Joseph Wakim said: “Everyone should remember that no faith tells you to harm innocent people. It is not open season on Muslims. It is not OK to go Muslim-bashing.

“Ironically, the raids were about stopping people feared to be terrorists, yet it is the Muslim people who are being terrorised.”

Mr Wakim, a former Victorian Multicultural Affairs Commissioner, has reminded Australians to learn from history and not to make the same mistakes, in particular by treating one group as “collectively guilty”.

Anti-Muslim sentiment has been felt around the country, with people reporting graffiti on mosques and attacks on homes. Threatening letters have been sent to businesses, bookshops and religious leaders.

The Australian National Imams Council (ANIC) has expressed anger that one of its most senior members, an assistant to the Grand Mufti of Australia, Ibrahim Abu Mohamed, was pulled up at Sydney airport on Thursday [18 September] on the way to the Haj, a religious pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia.

The imam, who met Prime Minister Tony Abbott and Attorney-General George Brandis recently, was stopped at the boarding gate, stripped of his mobile phone and iPad, and kept in a room for two hours without explanation, the general manager of ANIC, Samir Bennegadi, said.

Mr Bennegadi said the imam was treated in an unprofessional manner and he wondered that if this could happen to one of the most senior imams in Australia, what could happen to the rest of the Muslim population, “especially during this time, the Haj, we have hundreds of people leaving Australia every day?”

Rebecca Kay, the secretary of Salamcare, a community services group, said the community also feared being the targets of a raid.

“I know some women who have slept in their headscarves just in case,” she said.

Ms Kay is collating reports of hate crimes including harassment, abuse or being targeted, and will be presenting the information to the Human Rights Commission.

“We had some Aussie ladies standing making gun movements with their fingers towards some Muslim ladies,” she said.

From: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/we-are-the-ones-be...

No evidence of media prejudice against Catholicism

Claims that Fairfax and the ABC are picking on the Catholic Church are baffling.


Did you know Fairfax and the Australian Broadcasting Corporation are involved in a concerted attack on religious freedom in general, and the Catholic Church in particular?

You didn't? Well, Sen­ator George Brandis thinks you should.

Two weeks ago, the federal Attorney-General delivered a lec­ture on religious freedom to the Law School of the University of Notre Dame in Sydney. Freedom of religion is too often ignored, he complained, when human rights and freedoms are discussed and defended. He then launched into an extraordinary attack on Fairfax Media and the ABC.

It is worth quoting at some length:

"In fact, not only has reli­gious freedom been neglected, it has actually been the subject of open attack from those who domin­ated much of our political discourse, particularly in the national broadcaster and the Fairfax media. Almost invariably, their tar­gets have been the Christian churches, and in particular the Catholic Church, and people of Jewish faith. Indeed, so deaf have we become to attacks upon reli­gious liberty, so accepting have we been of the open scorn with which their tenets, their liturgy, their customs, their clergy and their congregations have been derided, that the great Dyson Heydon, delivering the Acton Lecture in April of this year, was moved to describe anti-Catholicism in mod­ern Australia as 'the racism of the intellectuals'."

Did Brandis offer his listeners a single example of this onslaught against religious freedom? Did he quote one program on the ABC, or one article in a Fairfax newspaper, that treated Catholic or Jewish tenets, liturgy and congregations with scorn? No, he did not; not one; which prompts me to wonder what the hell he was talking about.

Perhaps "the great" Dyson Heydon, AC, QC, lately of the High Court of Australia, can enlighten us. His Acton Lecture consisted mainly of an account of the attack on the Catholic Church in 19th-century Germany led by Chancel­lor Otto von Bismarck, the so-called Kulturkampf [culture struggle].

Towards the end of his lecture, briefly, Heydon mentioned modern Australia. "Now there may be a new anti-Catholic movement, particularly among the intellectuals. . . It is in­tolerant. It is hypocritical. It fails to recognise the extraordinary con­tribution of Australian Catholicism to education, to charitable relief, to the running of hospitals, to social progress of all kinds, to political life, and indeed to the life of the nation as a whole."

Like Brandis, Heydon saw no need to bore his listeners with ac­tual instances or evidence.

After playing some long extracts from Senator Brandis's lecture on his Religion and Ethics Report, the ABC's Andrew West turned to that classic "anti-Catholic" intellectual, David Marr, for a "response". Marr said he "supposed" Brandis was referring to the way Fairfax and ABC journalists had covered the issue of child abuse.

But is this really what Brandis was referring to? Was he really claiming that the sustained criticism in the media of the way the Catholic Church, and other religious institutions, have dealt with both the victims and the perpetrators of child abuse - criti­cism that has been so amply justi­fied by the revelations of the current royal commission - consti­tuted a sustained and unjustified attack on the tenets, the liturgy, the customs, the clergy and the congregations of the Catholic Church (and, for that matter, on the Jewish faith)?

Does that critical journalism constitute what Heydon chose to call "the racism of the intellectu­als"? It doesn't seem tenable. Yet, if Brandis and Heydon were not talk­ing about the coverage of child abuse, what on earth were they talking about?

After all, Australian Catholics are doing pretty well at the mo­ment. In a Liberal-National Party Coalition government, the Prime Minister, the Attorney-General, the Treasurer and some five other cabinet ministers are Catholics.

The Catholic Church still seems to wield enormous influence in the Australian Labor Party and the wider labour move­ment. Overwhelmingly popular so­cial measures, from same-sex marriage to voluntary euthanasia, have been blocked in the Federal Parliament, largely thanks to the opposition of Christian, and especially Catholic, union leaders and parliamentarians of all parties. This is not a church that, to outside eyes, is suffering from persecution or loss of political clout.

But if Marr is right, and Brandis and Heydon are actually talking about the reportage and comment­ary surrounding child abuse, that would be even more troubling. Cer­tainly, investigative journalism by the likes of the Newcastle Herald's Joanne McCarthy and ABC Lateline's Suzanne Smith, among many others, led directly to the Gillard government's decision to set up the royal commission. Should those reporters instead have turned a blind eye to the perpetrat­ors and their protectors in the Catholic Church, out of respect for "the extraordinary contribution of Australian Catholicism"? Of course not.

It is shocking and unacceptable that the nation's senior law officer should be accusing two of its main media organisations of conducting a systematic campaign against re­ligious freedom, and that one of its most respected former High Court judges should be hurling around phrases such as "the racism of the intellectuals", both without offer­ing a skerrick of evidence or justi­fication. Gentlemen, I challenge you to put up, or back down.

Jonathan Holmes is an Age columnist and a former presenter of the ABC's Media Watch program.

From: http://www.smh.com.au/comment/no-evidence-of-media-prejudice-against-cat...

Church’s investigator grilled on independence

Cameron Houston [and] Jane Lee

The Catholic Church’s independent commissioner was unable to explain how he received confidential information from a victim of serial paedophile priest Kevin O’Donnell, or why it was passed on to the church’s lawyers in an apparent breach of confidentiality.

The royal commission also raised concerns about the independence of Peter O’Callaghan, QC, who has investigated allegations of clerical abuse for the past 18 years under the church’s controversial Melbourne Response.

The church’s law firm, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, was also questioned over its handling of files and sensitive information from three separate arms of the Melbourne Response, which claim to be independent of each other.

Corrs Chambers Westgarth partner Richard Leder denied any confidentiality had been compromised in his role as lawyer for the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne and the Melbourne Response, which he helped establish in 1996.

But royal commission chairman Justice Peter McLellan appeared to be unconvinced.

“You must have Chinese walls inside your head,” he said.

Mr Leder was heckled by several victims attending the royal commission on Wednesday [20 August] when asked why complainants had been forced to
waive their common law rights in order to receive ex gratia payments of up to $50,000 under the Melbourne Response.

Mr Leder insisted the payments gave Victims “finality”, despite acknowledging they could have re-ceived significantly higher compensation if they had successfully sued the church.

From: http://www.smh.com.au/national/churchs-investigator-grilled-on-independe...

Former Adass Israel School principal to be extradited over alleged child sex abuse

Jewel Topsfield

The former head of an Orthodox Jewish school in Melbourne will be extradited to Australia to face charges of sexually abusing her students.

Malka Leifer, a former principal of the Adass Israel School in Elsternwick, fled to Israel in 2008 after the school board sacked her, following complaints of inappropriate conduct with students.

The Australian Attorney-General’s Department said Mrs Leifer had been arrested in Israel in response to an extradition request made by Australia.

“Ms Leifer is wanted to face prosecution in Victoria for alleged sexual assault offences,” a spokesperson said.

The Israeli news website Ynet reported that a resident of Emmanuel, a settlement town in the West Bank, was arrested on Sunday [17 August].

It said the woman was suspected of sexually abusing three sisters at an Orthodox high school in Melbourne between 2004 and 2008.

In 2008, parents told The Age Mrs Leifer had molested students at school, at her home and prob-ably at school camps.

They said one victim had attempted suicide.

The parents, who would not be named, said that Mrs Leifer would share her bed with different students when her rabbi husband was away.

“It’s very sensitive, because a girl who has been molested would find it hard to get married, so it’s very secret, hush-hush,” a parent told The Age at the time.

Sergeant Sharon Darcy from Victoria Police said the Moorabbin sexual offences and child abuse investigation team was investigating complaints of sex offences at an Elsternwick school. “As this is a current investigation it would be inappropriate to comment further,” Sergeant Darcy said.

The extradition comes as a former student is taking legal action against Mrs Leifer and the Adass Israel School for breach of duty.

Solicitor Nick Mazzeo, of law firm Lennon Mazzeo, confirmed one of his client’s cases is listed for trial in May 2015, seeking damages for pain, suffering and economic loss. Ynet reported that the arrested woman fled to Israel two days after details of about 74 sex offences allegedly committed against the three sisters were revealed.

Manny Waks, the CEO of Jewish child sexual abuse victim advocacy group Tzedek, welcomed the development. “It should be seen in the greater context of the ongoing child sexual abuse scandal that has been plaguing the Australian Jewish community in recent years where we have seen numerous convictions in both Melbourne and Sydney,” he said.

“Many victims are no longer willing to remain silent, and neither is the community.”

From: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/former-adass-israel-school-principal-m...

Victims tell of church compo fight

Cameron Houston [and] Jane Lee

Victims of clerical abuse have told the royal commission that the Catholic Church’s response was primarily concerned with avoiding civil litigation and limiting compensation payouts.

The church was urged to reform its controversial Melbourne Response and review all of the 326 cases it has settled since the system was introduced in 1996 by former archbishop of Melbourne George Pell.

The commission was told on Monday [18 August] that the church paid $17.2 million in ex gratia payments for child sexual abuse claims over the past 18 years, which included medical and counselling expenses. Victims received an average payout of $36,100.

The cost of administering the Melbourne Response was more than $17 million, which included $7.7 million to Independent Commissioner Peter O’Callaghan, QC, and his staff.

Serial paedophile priest Kevin O’Donnell was responsible for the largest number of payouts, with 50 victims receiving compensation for abuse spanning from 1944 to 1992.

Chrissie Foster told a packed room in Melbourne’s County Court that O’Donnell was directly responsible for the suicide of her eldest daughter, Emma, and the permanent brain damage sustained by her daughter Katie in a car accident. O’Donnell preyed upon both girls when they attended Oakleigh’s Sacred Heart primary school in the late 1980s, despite the church receiving repeated complaints about the priest from 1958.

Mrs Foster and her husband Anthony Foster fought back tears as they recounted their decade-long battle with the church and its lawyers. They pleaded for a more compassionate system that recognised the full extent of damage caused by predatory priests.

“Our view is that the Melbourne Response should be re-evaluated to ensure it complies with the legal and moral standards of our society to ensure just compensation and care for all victims,” Mrs Foster told the commission.

“To be clear, we think it is appropriate to revisit every previous settlement under the Melbourne Response to make sure proper financial compensation was paid.”

In August 1998, the Fosters received a letter from the church’s lawyers Corrs Chambers Westgarth informing them the church had agreed to pay $50,000 for the abuse to their eldest daughter.

The letter said it was an alternative to litigation, which would be strenuously defended.

The legal letter was accompanied by a written apology from former archbishop Pell.

“I felt there was an apology and then a threat. It was more of the same from the Catholic Church,” Mrs Foster said.

In 2002, the Fosters launched civil proceedings against the church, which included former archbishop of Melbourne Sir Frank Little and his successor Denis Hart as defendants.

The church settled the case in 2006 and agreed to pay $750,000, but refused to accept any liability.

Mrs Foster said the money could never compensate her family for the misery caused by O’Donnell.

From: http://www.smh.com.au/national/victims-speak-out-on-catholic-churchs-mel...

Failures by church “far worse” than physical abuse

Jane Lee [and] Cameron Houston

Paul Hersbach kept his composure until the end.

He, like all the 321 victims of child sexual abuse who have lodged claims to the Catholic Church’s Melbourne Response, had been forced to tell their stories to strangers before.

The first time he spoke about his abuse in detail, it was to two people at Carelink, the Melbourne Responses counselling arm, to explain why he needed access to its services as a primary victim, not a secondary victim. He found this confronting and “exceptionally traumatic”.

“I feel I told them more than I needed to and far more than I believe was reasonably required for them to do their job.”

Mr Hersbach explained how the man he once called “Gramps” had’ sexually abused his father, uncle, brother and himself as a child.

Victor Rubeo, who died on the day he was to appear in court for a committal hearing over charges of sexual abuse, “inserted” himself between father and son over 16 years.

“This despicable act was far worse than any physical abuse could ever have been,” he said.

Mr Hersbach recounted his meeting with the Melbourne Response’s Independent Commissioner, Peter O’Callaghan, QC, which “left no room . . . for compassion, debate or for me, the victim.”

Mr O’Callaghan had instead discouraged him from reporting the abuse to police because he did not think, given the “haziness of your memory”, they would act.

While the compensation panel members who determined how much he was to receive in compensation were more sympathetic to his plight, the process -
this week the focus of the royal commission - was marred by fear and confusion.

At its conclusion, Archbishop Denis Hart had signed a letter to Mr Hersbach with “Yours sincerely in Christ” and put a cross next to his name, as Rubeo used to do, in what he described as a generic show of sentiment: “It showed their lack of understanding of how I feel.”

He was momentarily relieved when he signed the deed to formally accept the church’s offer of compensation.

But it now sits in a drawer in his home as a permanent reminder of the day he signed away his right to take civil action against the church in court.

Mr Hersbach does not plan to sue the church, but wants it to release all victims from their deeds.

All victims’ claims should be reviewed independently and re-assessed without the $75,000 cap the church currently imposes. The church’s response to victims should be overhauled, using the royal com-mission as a blueprint.

“I do not need or want a personal apology. I do not want the church burned down,” His voice faltered only now. “All I want is for someone from the Catholic Church to show compassion and give me a call one day and say, ‘Hi Paul how are you going these days? Can I do anything to help?’”

Most of the court’s public gallery, filled with fellow victims, victims’ advocates and church representatives, applauded him as he left the stand.

From: http://www.smh.com.au/national/royal-commission-witness-testimony-201408...

God save me from religion in state schools

Chris Fotinopoulos

Despite constitutional efforts to pro­tect one's freedom from religion, God continues to be imposed on Australi­ans who do not wish to receive Him.

I was instructed to observe God at my state primary school in the early 1970s when all students sang "God Save the Queen" at assembly. <*>d, despite
"Advance Australia Fair" now being our national anthem, His presence still persists in some schools today.

I was surprised to discover recently that my nephew's state school has stu­dents recite a pledge which begins with the words "I love God". Parents who objected to this were dismissed by the principal as "petty" and told: "We are, after all, a Christian society."

This kind of righteous arrogance was on display at the Access Ministries meeting 1 attended two weeks ago.

The peak provider of school religious instruction convened the meeting after a new ministerial directive switched delivery of religious instruc­tion in state primary schools from an "opt-out" to an "opt in" arrangement.

Parents will now have to positively consent to their child receiving SRI, and principals can cancel SRI based on low numbers or if they believe the programs are against school values.

The changes have clearly unsettled Access Ministries, with general man­ager of Christian education and train­ing Linda White imploring the audience to "Embrace the opportunity we still have . . . to enhance our relevance."

Australians are free to worship. They are free to take an oath, attend places of worship, enrol their children in Sunday school and opt their children into Special Religious Instruction.

Australians are also free to reject religion. And this is what religious organisations such as Access Ministries don't get. They do not see their at­tempts to evangelise children as an attack on one's right to freedom from religion. They only see those who choose not to share their narrow moral view of the world as lost.

Chris Fotinopoulos is a secondary school teacher and writer.

From: http://www.theage.com.au/national/education/god-save-me-from-those-who-t...

Secrets, lies and ex-sect leader chooses life inside

Chris Johnston

Guilt can be a heavy burden; and this seems to be the case with the latest chapter in the disturbing story of a senior Victorian sect leader now in jail on child sex charges.

Ten days ago Chris Chandler, 56, drove to Melbourne from his property on French Island, in Western Port. Then he went to the Melbourne Magistrates Court to hand himself in.

Chandler was a leader of the secretive Bible sect known as Friends and Workers, or the Two by Twos, who have 2000 Victorian members. He had already
admitted his guilt in eight charges in a Gippsland court including unlawful indecent assaults, indecent assaults and gross indecency on three young female victims.

But Chandler baulked at his sentence of a year’s jail with a non-parole period of three months, telling his lawyers that, while he was guilty, he wasn’t guilty to that extent.

But then something changed. He decided he wanted to go to jail. When he turned up at Melbourne’s central magistrates court to surrender ? not the
Morwell court his hearings had been held in, and not the one closest to his home ? he hadn’t told the policeman who made the charges stick what he was
about to do.

Sergeant Darren Eldridge of Moe police was surprised to hear Chandler had given up his fight. He had been working on the case for two years. “We were assisted in different ways by a number of congregation members,” he said.

The sect is a strange offshoot of the Cooneyites; it adheres strongly to Bible sections of Matthew 10 to do with Jesus sending out disciples to cleanse “impure spirits”.

They do not have church buildings or headquarters and do not have written policies or doctrines. Travelling missionaries live with sect families for extended periods.

Television, radio, movies, dancing and jewellery are banned. It is strong in Victoria because the Irish founder of the Cooneyites was the Protestant evangelist Ed-ward Cooney, who moved to Mildura and died there in 1960.

A submission to the Victorian parliamentary inquiry into the handling of child abuse by religious groups by WINGS, an online group of ex-sect members, said it has been “haphazard” in dealing with many sexual abuse allegations.

The sect was linked to the suicides of Narelle and Stephen Henderson, aged 14 and 12, of Pheasant Creek near Kinglake, in 1994. Narelle’s suicide note read: “We committed suicide because all our life we were made to go to meetings. They try to brainwash us so much and have ruined our lives.”

The sect holds five Victorian conventions a year at Speed (near Mildura), Colac, Drouin and Thoona (near Benalla), where a prominent sect family has a farm.

A Fairfax Media investigation last year established sect leaders knew of the allegations against Chandler but promoted him, in 1991, to the senior position of “worker”, or minister ? meaning he was staying in private homes until 2004 in Wodonga, Shepparton, Launceston and rural Tasmania.

He later positioned himself as a counsellor and sect contact for child sexual abuse victims. He recently returned from stints for the sect in South America and Africa.

The Victorian and Tasmanian leader of Friends and Workers, David Leitch, of Melbourne, is known to be close to Chandler. He would not comment, but an ex-sect source claimed he has a file on alleged sexual offences by Chandler, which he has not given to police. Leitch sacked a sect leader for reporting sexual abuse in 2013.

Ex-member “Ruby” (not her real name), of Gippsland, said Chandler was close to her family and that she was sexually assaulted by him in 1989 when she was 10. Her allegations led to one of the eight charges against him. She says the pair were at a beach when he rubbed his erection against her and asked if she “wanted to make him happy”. He later tried to have a conversation with her about sexual rights and consent, she said.

She said the sect had a “culture of secrecy” and distrust of outsiders. Sexual abuse of young people and children was common. She said she was visited by sect head Leitch before she went to police. “He said to me ‘if you go to the police there’s not much they can do’.”

She said Chandler messaged her through Facebook claiming he was molested as a child, that he had a different memory of the beach incident and that he was not a paedophile but rather suffered from obsessive compulsive disorder.

“It is not so much what he did to me,” she said.

“I know he did worse things to others who are not emotionally strong enough to act. I want to get it all out in the open.”

Sergeant Eldridge said Chandler had made contact with family members of other alleged victims before handing himself in.

From: http://www.smh.com.au/national/secrets-lies-and-sex-abuse-as-exsect-lead...

Christians to upskill school instructors

Benjamin Preiss

The main provider of controversial Christian religious instruction in state schools will shake up training for instructors, offering accredited courses through a private college.

Access Ministries’ entry into the private training market comes after the resignation of chief executive Evonne Paddison. Acting chief executive Dawn Penney has outlined her plans, including a more open and communicative relationship with the 12 Christian denominations that belong to the group.

Access Ministries is creating its own accredited course in Christian education to be offered in partnership with the Australian College of Ministries. The provider stressed it intends to raise the standard of instructors, not generate income through training.

It is negotiating with the Education Department for a new funding agreement.

Earlier this year the Education Department issued a ministerial directive that schools could withdraw religious instruction if there were insufficient resources. It also said religious instruction must be “clearly opt-in” for parents.

Fairness in Religions in School campaign member Scott Hedges said religious instruction had no place in state schools.

From: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/access-ministries-revamps-training-for...

Syndicate content